91991111 Non verbal, so described
Final ASCL language record. This is the terminal eight-digit code level in the 2025 Australian Standard Classification of Languages.
Classification path for Non verbal, so described
The official ASCL hierarchy places Non verbal, so described within Non verbal, so described. The path below shows which part of the eight-digit record identifies each increasingly specific level.
| ASCL level | Code | Classification |
|---|---|---|
| Language family group | 91 | Other Languages |
| Sub family group | 9199 | Non verbal, so described |
| Narrow group | 919911 | Non verbal, so described |
| Language | 91991111 | Non verbal, so described |
When to use the final language code
Use 91991111 when the recorded response identifies Non verbal, so described specifically. If the response only supports the broader label Non verbal, so described, compare the records on the parent narrow-group page instead of inferring a terminal language.
Continue your ASCL lookup
Compare languages in Non verbal, so described
Browse the complete ASCL 2025 hierarchy
About this language code
ASCL language pages are the end point of the hierarchy. They are the most specific record level exposed in the official 2025 structure and should be used when the language has been identified precisely enough for final coding.
If your dataset is less precise, move back to the parent narrow group or sub family page and confirm whether a broader code is more appropriate.
Language code facts
- Code
- 91991111
- Family group
- 91 Other Languages
- Sub family
- 9199 Non verbal, so described
- Narrow group
- 919911 Non verbal, so described
Compliance risk score
2 of 2 factors passing
In this section
Frequently asked questions
What is ASCL code 91991111?
Non verbal, so described is an eight-digit language record in ASCL 2025. It is the terminal code used when the language has been identified to the final record level.
Where would this code be used?
ASCL codes appear in ABS language coding, census-related work and administrative data collections where language needs a standard reference.
Should I use the parent group code instead?
Only if the dataset is less specific than the final language record. If the language is known, the end code is usually the better match.
Source and trust
- Official ASCL source
- ABS ASCL 2025
- Last reviewed
- 2026-04-18
This page is based on the official ABS ASCL structure workbook. Use the ABS release when a formal classification decision is required.
Please verify critical classification decisions with the official authority before using them for tax, payroll, licensing, immigration or compliance work.